It runs two funds with a total of $220m (£110m) under management, but crucially has a business model that can be scaled upwards and gives RAB access to the rapid- growth south-east Asian hedge fund markets. Although the fees vary from fund to fund, performance fees can run up to 20 per cent of a fund’s profit. But the idea that hedge funds are inherently high-risk is a myth, and most operate risk controls that make Fort Google Local Marketing Services Knox look slack.
There aren’t many ways ordinary investors can get into the hedge-fund market; given the negative headlines over the past week, most probably have no desire to change that. Pharma has done well today as it has been smashed up over the past few weeks and is looking a good, solid buy at the moment. The market has been getting rid of some of the high-risk stocks and buying defensive. GlaxoSmithKline and Shire were among the biggest risers, but top of the pile was AstraZeneca, which finished up 76p at 2659p.
The continued downward spiral of the FTSE 100 saw traders reaching for the drugs yesterday, or more specifically, going long on blue-chip pharmaceuticals companies as they looked to go defensive. The FTSE 100 continued its decline from the previous day, sinking by almost 63 points in early morning, before finally closing 31.7 down. Unease over sub-prime debt continues to nag at traders in the UK, while a shock profits warning from the country’s fifth largest mortgage lender, Northern Rock, dragged the market even lower.
The bank was the biggest faller in the top tier after revealing its full-year profits would fail to hit analysts’ targets. The Newcastle-based group’s share price sank gradually lower over the day until closing a staggering 12 per cent down at 834p. The slide prompted its peers to follow suit with Alliance & Leicester the next to fall, finishing the day on 1,091p, 2.59 per cent lower.
There’s bullying and some of them just stay passive as if it never exists in their class, in which case, either way, the victim is, like, left with no support, humiliated. I’m not just talking about. I’m talking from watching it in classes anyway, with other people. I reckon teachers need to be more aware and look for the signs. Teachers must under go some sort of training to deal with that, to recognise if there are any physical signs or things, you know. It’s such a serious matter, bullying, and can have long-lasting effects and they need to seo services list be a bit more aware of these types of things. Education policy around exclusion needs to change. School have excluded one young person because he truants.
The stuff around education needs sorting out because of the knock-on effect and just the destructiveness of kids that are out of education. It was clear from many parents interviewed for this research that one of the factors that made it more difficult to ask for help was their own feeling that having to do so meant that they had failed as parents. Given the extension of the adolescent period, the fact that other services will have to kick in should a young person become homeless, and the mine field that is the benefits system for this age group.
The government should consider amending the Children Act guidance to make it clear that family support should be provided up to the age of 18. It is clear from those interviewed for this report that many families struggle to access support. Further, that while access is theoretically universal, black and ethnic minority parents seem not to be among those taking up those opportunities that are available.
Connexions and GPs could be utilised as a gateway to family support services without parents having to go through social services. This could have a significant impact on those parents who do not seek help because of the stigma of approaching social services and their concern that social services intervention will inevitably lead to their child or children being accommodated.
The inquiry is being held at a time when the Scottish Executive is promising tougher measures to deal with youth crime. The inquiry, which is chaired by the former Bishop of Edinburgh, the Rev Richard Holloway, aims to take a considered, dispassionate view of the issue, based on what is best for children and young people and for society as a whole. The Inquiry panel will review a large body of evidence from a range of people and agencies in Scotland in producing its final report later this year. Today’s day-long inquiry in Stirling will provide a wealth of information to inform the inquiry panel’s final report.
The morning session will consider if the present system is working and will include evidence from David Pia of Audit Scotland, David Strang, the Chief Constable of Dumfries and Galloway and John Scott, Director of Scottish Human Rights Centre. The afternoon session will examine what works and what can be done better. They will call for a range of new support for parents and communities and Google advertising services greater involvement by young people and parents in the hearings. The Scottish Executive has also been invited to attend to explain their new ‘hard line’ approach to young people and parents and how this will fit with existing legislation and policy.
Evidence will also be taken from parents and young people from Easterhouse in Glasgow, young people from the Who Cares. organisation which represents looked after children, young people who use services of Stirling Council and others from NCH projects. A leading QC, Simon Di Rollo will lead the evidence from the various parties during the hearing in his role as acting on behalf of Scotland’s children.
This inquiry is entering its crucial stage where we have a chance to hear from a wide range of different people about what we should be doing in Scotland about young people in trouble. Clearly a lot has changed since the Kilbrandon report was produced in 1968 but sadly other things have remained the same. It remains the case today, just as it was in the 1960s, that young people in trouble are often troubled young people. They are more likely to come from a poor background, to have done badly at school and to have been poorly supervised by their parents.